home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT1715>
- <title>
- July 02, 1990: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- July 02, 1990 Nelson Mandela:A Hero In America
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 26
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST
- Getting Shamir's Attention
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> "Call us when you're serious about peace. Here's our
- number." Tough talk from the U.S. Secretary of State to the
- Israeli Prime Minister a few weeks back. But just talk. Yitzhak
- Shamir and his hard-line colleagues have shrugged off worse
- from Washington before. So they sat tight, and last Wednesday
- their arrogance was rewarded. Baker's studied pique was
- undermined by Washington's suspension of its dialogue with
- Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organization. It would now
- appear that the U.S. is talking to neither side in the
- Arab-Israeli dispute, a stance that at best is dangerous:
- history proves that the Middle East roils whenever prospects
- for peace recede.
- </p>
- <p> This is not to say that Arafat did not deserve a slap. He
- renounced terrorism in 1988, but has so far refused to condemn
- specifically the foiled May 30 Palestinian attack on a Tel Aviv
- beach. Yet Arafat's predicament is understandable. The P.L.O.
- is a contentious collection of ideologically disparate
- factions, but they are united in wondering what 18 months of
- dialogue with the U.S. has bought. P.L.O. requests seem
- reasonable enough: direct talks with Israel, a United Nations
- team to investigate alleged Israeli abuses of Palestinian
- human rights in the occupied territories, a chance for Arafat
- to plead his case at the General Assembly in New York. What
- they have got is nothing, and it was the U.S. that vetoed U.N.
- inspection of the West Bank and Gaza.
- </p>
- <p> Shamir is the one who really needs a clubbing from
- Washington. The policy guidelines of his right-wing government
- enshrine the central obstacle to peace: Jerusalem's insistence
- on the "eternal" claim of Israel to hold and settle the
- occupied territories.
- </p>
- <p> So what does Bush do? Last week he sent Shamir a letter.
- Tell me, Prime Minister, asked the President, are you "serious"
- about peace? The answer, of course, is yes. As ever, Shamir is
- serious about a Shamir-style peace, a nonstarter that assumes
- Palestinian capitulation.
- </p>
- <p> It is time for a change. As long as the U.S. funnels $3
- billion a year to Israel regardless of Jerusalem's actions,
- Shamir will never move. A message stronger than a phone number
- is required. If an aid cut is politically impossible--as was
- made evident when Senator Robert Dole first suggested a modest
- decrease last January--then several other measures might
- capture Jerusalem's attention.
- </p>
- <p> For openers, Washington could treat Israel like virtually
- every other recipient of U.S. aid. Israel receives its
- assistance in a single check, rather than quarterly. Since
- Jerusalem does not need all the money immediately, it invests
- in U.S. Treasury bonds. A sweet deal: Israel lends back
- America's own cash and earns an additional $76.7 million in
- interest.
- </p>
- <p> If treating Israel like other nations is beyond Washington's
- courage, then certainly the U.S. must insist that the extra
- $400 million in congressionally approved housing loan
- guarantees be withheld until Israel promises not to move Soviet
- immigrants to the occupied territories.
- </p>
- <p> How dare you even think of attaching strings to your aid,
- says Eliahu Ben-Elissar, an influential Shamir aide. "We are
- not a colony." Ben-Elissar is right. Israel is not a colony--but neither is it an indigent client entitled to assistance as
- a matter of right against American interests.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-